The Science of Terroir: Part 1

I understand winemaking is more art than science, but (unfortunately) I'm closer to a scientist than an artist at the time of this writing.

My original intention for this post was to develop a “scientific” framework1 to understand the concept of “terroir” by examining the intricate relationship between a vine's physical environment and the resulting wine.

However, I'm thinking about changing the direction of the research. After reading about five (highly-cited) academic papers on this topic, I realised two things:

I will write about the science of terroir whenever I come across an interesting article or paper.

But first, I'm going to look for an old article on the topic of terroir and examine how the concept was viewed back then, hopefully, without forcing any scientific lens.3

Below are the summaries of the two papers I found interesting as they point towards my current hypothesis: the transfer mechanism is us.4

I also found it fascinating that altitude affected the chemical compositions of wines more than precipitation or growing degree days. Further research on the altitude and/or the atmospheric pressure on the physiology of vines and winemaking process is warranted.

Here's the first paper: The Value of Soil Knowledge in Understanding Wine Terroir By Robert E. White from The School of Agriculture and Food, The University of Melbourne

Introduction:

Concepts of Terroir:

Physicochemical Factors – Water, Nitrogen, and Temperature:

Physicochemical Factors – Soil Nutrients:

Microbiological Factors:

Other Questions:

Conclusion:

And here's the second paper: Taste, terroir, and technology By Roger Pinder from International Journal of Wine

Complex Interplay of Terroir and Taste:

In-depth Chemical Analysis:

Regional Sensory Distinctions:

Influence of Altitude and Winery Processing:

Perception and Flavour Creation:

Conclusion and Future Directions:

Concludes that the notion of terroir involves both tangible factors (soil, climate, altitude) and intangible aspects (perception, processing methods).

Notes:

1: As I'm proofreading my post, I feel what I mean by “scientific” is actually quantitative. 2: I was too linear in my thinking when linking the soil and the grape in my mind. 1 – 0 to Mother Nature. 3: That's going to be Part II. 4: I need to fine tune my hypothesis but I think we are the conduit for translating the environment to the grape (by influencing two fundamental factors: sunlight and access to water.)